P-Cards: After the Million Dollar Investigation
With just $20,000 remaining of the $1 Million dollars allocated, lawyers Paul Coggins and Madeleine Johnson submitted Fish & Richardson's final report to DISD Board Members and DISD Superintendent Michael Hinojosa during Thursday's board briefing.
An 82 page report, along with 4,000 pages of exhibits and 93 pages of "employee referral reports" were being distributed to board members late Thursday. Most of the documents have been placed on the DISD website for the public to view (view here).
"There were no sacred cows," insisted Coggins when asked by a board member, "...there was no sense of protection [for any employee from investigation]"
Coggins' firm, for its $1 million dollar tab, examined only a fraction (200) of the 1,400 employees and their 3,100 credit cards.
Among the 200 employees whose charges were examined, was fired-then-rehired Principal Ardis McCann.
Fish & Richardson attorney Kip Mendrygal, barely 3 years out of law school at the time, and private investigator Peter Nielsen (hired by Fish & Richardson) recommended McCann be fired for his failure to produce sufficient charge receipts.
When McCann's staff subsequently located a lost box of receipts, Mendrygal and Nielsen testified they believed McCann was lying and still made the recommendation to fire him.
Fish & Richardson referred the matter to the Superintendent's Ad-Hoc Legal Committee--a committee charged with "hearing and reviewing" disciplinary suggestions from the firm. The committee, made of of Superintendent Michael Hinajosa's top brass, included Deputy Superintendent Steve Flores.
Flores, with his memory failing him often throughout his deposition, testified that even if he had been able to produce 100% of his missing receipts, McCann should have still been fired (read the story and Flores' deposition).
After legal wrangling, an agreement (the details of which are secret) was reached and McCann was reinstated to a different position.
So Who Is Getting The Blame?
Recurrent themes throughout Coggins' report were references to deficiencies in the "Quality Control Office" headed by Sherri Brokaw--currently on administrative leave after being publicly called "incompetent" by, former DISD spokesman Celso Martinez.
Brokaw's job was to oversee the procurement card program.
Coggins' report seemed to place much of the blame on Brokaw, and her 2 fellow staff-members for failing to monitor over $71 million dollars in expenditures and over 250,000 transactions on the District's 3,100 cards.
Brokaw was accused by former District employee Gloria Orapello, according to Coggins, of removing a "red flag" system in the District's "flawed" Oracle-based credit card reporting database--an automatic message intended to notify supervisors when card holders made charges.
According to the Fish & Richardson report, several supervisors complained the Oracle reporting system was "confusing at best and essentially worthless at worst" because it would notify supervisors "thirty, sixty, or ninety days after the Pcard purchases were made and did not include the name of the Pcard holder..."
Orapello pled guilty to embezzling funds from DISD and is awaiting sentencing.
But is Brokaw merely a scapegoat, as she claims, for costly mistakes of more senior officials?

Multiple Audit Reports Ignored By Senior Officials
Who was responsible for Brokaw's department--and her 2 employees?
DISD's organization chart shows Brokaw to be a lower level manger reporting to Financial Services Associate Superintendent David Rastellini.
Rastellini reports to Business Services Division Deputy Superintendent Ron Peace.
Peace reports to Hinojosa.
Records show that District superintendents (executives) ignored and failed to act on multiple audit reports which raised red flags about the District's P-Card program in 2003 and 2005. One of the three ignored audits was performed by KPMG in 2005.
All reports were presented to the Board of Trustees and the Superintendent (excerpts are on the District Website).
These audit reports indicated that Brokaw's office, which devoted most of its time to training, was overwhelmed and could not adequately monitor the District's procurement card system.
Further, questions have been raised as to whether Brokaw had the power to implement changes recommended in the reports.
So who did? Rastellini? Peace? Hinojosa?
When asked if District officials were "scapegoating" a low-level manager for executive-level failures, Coggins indicated he was not in a position to comment.
[Obviously, Dallas.Org will monitor this situation as it develops.]
How Fish & Richardson's Bills Broke Down
Madeleine Johnson said, today, that out of the $980,000 final bill, about $660,000 was for attorney's fees. Another $280,000 was paid to private investigator Peter Nielsen.
An analysis of Fish & Richardson's bills (view the summary here) found that:
- A total of 2,125 total hours had been billed by Fish & Richardson's staff as of March 15, 2007
- Kip Mendrygal racked up 884.5 hours, or 41.6% of the total time billed to taxpayers
- Amalia Macias, a paralegal, billed 897.8 hours, or 42.2% of the total time
- Madeleine Johnson billed 194.9 hours, or 9.2% of the total
- Paul Coggins billed 102.8, or 4.8% of the total
There were several instances where attorneys billed for discussions among themselves, each charging $350-an-hour. They also charged for reviewing and responding to each other's email--which we're told is a common, but expensive, practice at some large law firms.
Navigant Consulting (a firm hired to "crunch" data for Fish & Richardson), records show, has already been paid $165,708.40--leading to the question: will this investigation exceed $1,000,000?
Wrapping It Up
Fish & Richardson ended up reviewing 200 of the 1,400 DISD cardholders and their 3,100 credit cards. Their bill will cost taxpayers about $980,000.
Out of those employees examined, 45% (about 93 employees) were found to have violated the rules. A handful have been disciplined:
- Two secretaries, who were the focus of investigations by the Dallas Morning News, have been prosecuted
- Around 10 employees are currently on administrative leave
- Six employees have resigned or been fired
- Two employees have been reinstated
So what's next for the other 1,200 employees never investigated?
The answer may be in a statement Superintendent Hinojosa made to the Dallas Morning News (read the article):
"There are things that have occurred that we're not proud of ... and we apologize. But, also, we have a much bigger mission here. Our mission here is to become the best urban district in the country by 2010. We have a lot of important work to do for the young people of this city."
So with multiple audit reports ignored, and $1,000,000 all-but-spent, only 14% of spenders were actually examined.
Out of the other 1,200 who may have charged $100 here-or-there, all indications are that they've "gotten away with it."
Several of the board members praised Coggins for his firm's hard work (video coming).
Board President Jack Lowe, in addition to thanking Coggins, went a step further and praised "the other 19,000 employees" who didn't steal from "DISD's open till."
No one apparently pointed out to Lowe that only 1,400 employees had credit cards--and out of those, only 200 were even reviewed.
So, is this the end of it?
Will this turn out to be another million-dollar debacle with a few "sacrificial scapegoats" and the rest "swept under the rug?"
Only time, and perhaps a few more lawsuits, will tell.



Impressed With Young Mendrygal
I will have to admit that, after going through the mounds of reports, that I'm rather impressed with young Fish & Richardson attorney Kip Mendrygal's efforts (Mendrygal did the "lion's share" of the day-to-day work and kept up with the minutia).
As one other commenter noted, young lawyers are aggressive and have much better retention skills than us older guys (I see the same thing in the IT world).
The only thing that disappoints me is that when the "product was sold" last summer, I was left with the impression we'd be looking at everybody--not just 200.
I'm also a little disappointed at the bill (in case no one has gathered that from the other blog entries).
But that's not Kip's fault.
Good work, Kip.
We could have predicted the results!
So, we've learned 2 things from the recent DISD "investigation" -
1. NEVER admit you've done anything wrong because you can "outlast" the powers that be and nothing will happen to you!
2. KEEP all of your charged expenses under the $999.99 mark and you won't be held accountable!
We could have predicted the outcome.
A few people will be held accountable and the others who also spent taxpayer funds illegally will get by with it.
I'm so disgusted and disappointed in this mishandled fiasco.
I still intend to ask my former assistant principal why she spent $150-200 every two weeks in 2004 at Minyards using her DISD credit card.
Evidently, she was "under the limit" so she explainably wasn't questioned.
Heart Goes Out to McCann
I just read Kips deposition and my heart goes out to Mr. McCann.
How could a member of the Superintendent's Ad-Hoc committee conveniently forget to disclose that the DISD legal department requested all receipts documenting purchases made with retail gift cards or shop cards, that had been purchased with DISD procurement cards held by all DISD personnel for 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
The documents were due in the School Attorney's, Room 115, Administration Building. This notice went out in the Week-At-A-Glance on December 5, 2004.
The receipts were turned in, so the legal department had them and it explains why some of the production was not nice and neat and why some are sporadically missing by various vendors; at least for the years mentioned.
It is unacceptable that the legal review team concealed this fact by omission from the public, the investigation team and more importantly, Mr. McCann and his attorneys.
I know one of the members of this committee, and in my opinion, this omission was no accident. Instead, it's just a typical DISD tactic.
[Ed Note: Yes, we're investigating individual members of the Ad-Hoc committee right now. There's much more to this story. It will be around for awhile.]
DISD Lawyers
Shakespeare said it best, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
No, let's NOT kill them, let's investigate them.
Gwinn, you do a great job with this site.
I ask you and the public who reads this, is there ANY way an investigation into the Star Chamber of attorneys in the DISD can be hacked?
It makes total sense that the DISD depends on its lawyers for advice, but look at the advice.
The question becomes,"Do the lawyers want to screw the taxpayers and the students, or do we do this to ourselves?"
Can the public ask for some sort of accounting?
Another posting asked why discipline is so bad in DISD.
Lawyers.
Parents--even the kids threaten to use them.
That is why all teachers need to join a union for their own personal liability protection, not for job security.
Parents threaten to sue over a bad grade, a referral or anything else!
The DISD lawyers ramp things up and cost the taxpayers.
They are used by the district to intimidate teachers at hearings or investigations.
It is like the "secret police," according to some who have been through the system.
If the DISD has a lawyer at every hearing, the teacher needs one, too.
Not once do you ever hear the lawyers having staff development on how they protect the teachers, or how to use the laws for teachers and education to the advantage of the classroom teacher.
So, if anyone out their has the juice, look into this?
[Ed Note: Yes, we can look into how much the District spends on outside legal fees each year. I remember someone once commenting that "DISD spends more on lawyers than does the City of New York!" We'll see.]
P-Cards, Corruption and Administration
Having been inside DISD, I can understand your frustration with the entire situation.
Did you honestly think a complete, fair, and honest investigation would be done.
Never!
As soon as it leads up the chain to the top of the rank and file, items disappear, evidence is suppressed, and memories go blank.
How hard would you really look if DISD is paying your bill? Not very hard.
So step back and look at the whole picture.
$71 million on p-cards, $1 million in attorney fees, KPMG's audit, and Carol Keeton-Ryland's audit and still the students lacked books for a proper education.
In some cases there wasn't even a class set of text books.
No PE classes with proper gym equipment and barely any money for even one science lab for the entire year.
The pervasive attitude is let the students be fat and ignorant, because I have my paycheck.
And some how through all of this muck racking, every one thinks the students don't get it.
Well, they do and that is why they are so angry. Try to change the system and do the honest and ethical thing, and you are hog tied, black mailed or worse-framed.
Yes, intimidation does works and has always been alive and well at DISD.
I applaud your efforts Mr. Gwinn, however, everyone has missed the biggest legal tactic ever against DISD.
It is called "failure to educate" and is based on "gross negligence" for which there is no immunity.
How can someone teach without the basics?
Where are the science labs?
Where are the math labs?
Where is the support for the teachers?
Why do they walk out of staff development without anything to even implement in the lesson plan?
Where is the discipline?
Why are they afraid of the parents and warn the students the drug dogs are coming while under a cheese epidemic?
How does a board member even know who is ahead of the Blood and the Crips and get a personal meeting with them?
Is every classroom clean, decorated, neat and fully stocked? No.
Why are the principals in charge of the money and give one teacher $200 and another teacher $3,000?
Yet, the teacher getting the most money doesn't teach?
Why is public access so monitored?
Because DISD has lots to hide, they don't care about protecting the students unless it is in a category that is used to rate the campus.
Then they will change grades, attendance, minimize the discipline or blame the teacher.
What goes on within the walls of DISD is a quandary.
There is very little integrity, honesty or values.
I hope you get the picture, because I have been there and got the T-shirt.
In time, you will see DISD go back to the same tactics of squandering money, because bottom line is: no one cares.
[Ed Note: Yes, but tell us how you really feel! I'd ask Hinojosa to respond to this but I'm afraid he's not going to talk to us again!]
P-Card
Tax payers in Dallas County should march on 3700 Ross and demand that the 71 million of our tax money be paid back.